Biderman’s Daily Edge 7/19/2012: You Have to Believe in Hitchcock’s “McGuffin” to Be in Politics


There seems to be little doubt that we need a new constitution, or at least a new way of governing ourselves. The response to my post July 4 rant that we need a constitutional convention was mostly positive. There were several who worried that a convention could get hijacked by nutcases but almost everybody seems to agree that what we have got now is not working.


Upon reflection, I think that we most certainly will be having some sort of new constitutional convention in the future. There are two ways it will happen. The first is as a result of our paternalistic government going bust in trying to provide everything to everybody. In essence we will be forced to start over; and hopefully a convention will be peaceful.


Second, we could decide to hold a new constitutional convention before we go bust. Of course the powers that be, government workers, special interests and those who live on government checks say they will only allow a new constitutional convention over their dead bodies. Hopefully it will not have to be a literal dead body.


Alfred Hitchcock said that to enjoy his movies you had to believe in the McGuffin. The McGuffin was a plot device without which the movie does not work. Western economies all have a McGuffin that you have to believe in to play politics today. That McGuffin is that governments, whether led by Republicans or Democrats, can effectively provide goods and services. You have to believe in the McGuffin, particularly to vote for Obama. Last week Obama in essence said, government provided services are essential to business. What nonsense. Government activity is the problem not the solution.


Have you ever seen any analysis on government effectiveness? Do you think government officials would allow any analysis? We spend trillions fighting wars. How effective has that money been? I am not just talking about military wars. There is poverty war, the drug war, health care? Delivering the mail? What does government do that is at all effective? Before some of you go nuts finding exceptions, yes, many local governments do effectively provide utility type services. And yes where there is active community involvement, there might be local governments that actually are effective. But how many local governments effectively do provide services? Very, very few. State and local governments have been much more effective at padding their own pension benefits than educating, medicating or incarcerating.


So this is not the right time to call for a constitutional convention. The reason is that a constitutional convention will not be allowed to happen. What might make a difference is to keep highlighting government results to puncture the McGuffin of government competence.


Among my own contributions to puncture the myth of government competence is the videos I have done on why government data is inaccurate and misleading. I am not saying bad government data is due to a conspiracy. Rather, remember the McGuffin? Our government is just as ineffective at providing useful real time economic data as it is at everything else it does. Yet for some reason investors continue to believe in the accuracy of widely circulated initial monthly government data. The data is just another McGuffin!


The Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Department of Labor and Census Bureau continue to use surveys combined with historic data overlays. It makes no sense that those bureaus refuse to use newly available real time metrics, such as credit and check card activity and withheld income and employment tax payments. After many conversations in the past with government economists, my take is that as long as they get their pension benefits, what do they care if their data sucks?


Charles Biderman
President & CEO, TrimTabs Investment Research
Portfolio Manager, TrimTabs Float Shrink ETF (TTFS)


4 Responses to Biderman’s Daily Edge 7/19/2012: You Have to Believe in Hitchcock’s “McGuffin” to Be in Politics

  1. [...] Biderman on poltics and the need to change the constitution. [...]

  2. Mary on July 21, 2012 at 5:54 am

    You make me very nervous when you talk about needing a new constitution. Here’s why: When our founding fathers put together our current constitution, they had just left behind a miserable situation in England so their main goal was to put something together that would protect the people of this new country from the tyrannies they had experienced. That was then. Today, and for some time now, our leaders in this country have ignored the constitution. I firmly believe if they were following it closely, we wouldn’t be in this mess. We are in this mess because our leaders have been and continue to be, for the most part, self-centered, criminals only focused on feathering their nests at the cost to the citizens. Given the state of our leaders today, what makes you think a new constitution would not be written that would be even more likely to allow the self-centered criminals to continue their efforts at warp speed? Additionally, we have enough people in this country now who couldn’t tie their own shoes, much less reason out whether they should vote for a newly-minted constitution.

    Please stop with the new constitution stuff, start promoting that our government leaders start following it, and get back to what you do best.

    Thank you.

  3. Joel on July 23, 2012 at 2:39 am

    The problem is lack of accountability, not the consitition. This stems from apathy with- in our community’s. The political system will remain broken untill we start holding our elected officials responseable from a nonpartisan stand based soley on execution. How do you make your nabors care?

  4. Maso palmer on July 23, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    Regulatory and legislative capture mean that the parasites have an unobstructed range of motion and a stranglehold on the economy. No conequences to organized crime behavior? We get more of the same and worse. The steal- with- both hands mentality has moved horizontally across the corporate spectrum. Biderman is right. Remember, the alternative is not peaceful and polite.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Charles BidermanCharles Biderman is the Chairman of TrimTabs Investment Research and Portfolio Manager of the TrimTabs Float Shrink ETF (TTFS)

Biderman’s Practices of Success

I recently launched a new online course, Biderman's Practices of Success, on ( The key to the practice of success is to be fully present in the moment and to be totally engaged in the important areas of life, particularly when we do not want to be. Read More.

Mr. Charles Biderman is an associated person of Trim Tabs Asset Management, LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser. All opinions expressed by Mr. Biderman on this website are solely those of Mr. Biderman and do not reflect the opinions of Trim Tabs Asset Management, LLC, Trim Tabs Investment Research, Inc., their affiliates (collectively, “Trim Tabs”), or any other associated persons of Trim Tabs. No part of Mr. Biderman’s compensation from Trim Tabs is related to opinions which he expresses on this website, elsewhere on the internet, or in any other medium.

You should not treat any opinion expressed by Mr. Biderman as a recommendation to make an investment in any company discussed or cited in any of his postings. Mr. Biderman’s opinions are based upon information he considers credible, but which does not constitute research by Trim Tabs. Neither Mr. Biderman nor Trim Tabs warrants the completeness or accuracy of the information upon which Mr. Biderman’s opinions are based.