Expect Immediate Negative Impact From Higher Taxes

Dec
05

 

By Charles Biderman

The US and global stock markets and economies will be immediately negatively impacted by higher US taxes, and that appears where we are headed with or without a fiscal cliff deal. It appears that the best deal we can expect, if there is one, would raises taxes by $200 billion annually. That would result in an annualized 3% drop in after-tax take home pay.

 

It gets a lot worse if there’s no deal, and we go off the fiscal cliff. The result of no deal will be about $500 billion in higher taxes. That would drop after tax income by a whopping 7.5% annualized. The US has not experienced that big a drop in after tax income since perhaps the 1930′s. While a 3% drop will hurt, a 7.5% drop will devastate both US and global stock markets.

 

Some in the media are saying that it is no big deal if we don’t make the fiscal cliff deadline because higher tax rates for a few months until there is a deal would not materially impact the economy or the stock markets over the short term. This is pure and utter nonsense.

 

Why can I be so certain? All we have to do is go back to 2001 to examine how both the business cycle and the stock market are dramatically impacted by significant changes in take home pay, whether up or down.

 

TrimTabs has the tools to do this because we have been analyzing daily withheld income and employment taxes since we realized it was available in the late 1990’s.

 

In February, 2001 wage and salary growth slumped to 3% after having grown between 4% and 6% yearly since 1996. So what happened to the market? Stocks sold off sharply. As 2001 went on, income growth kept trending lower until turning negative in August 2001 – a month before 9/11. Stocks kept dropping through mid 2002.

 

Then after tax income, aided by a late 2001 Bush tax cut, bottomed in June and started rising in July 2002. It is no coincidence that the Nasdaq bottomed that summer as well.

 

The rate of income growth kept rising from 2002 through October 2007, peaking at 7% around end of 2006. However, starting in September and October 2007, income growth slowed sharply from about 6% to 3% and then turned negative in 2009. The stock market peaked that October 2007 and kept selling off until the Federal Reserve intervened March 2009.

 

But don’t expect the Federal Reserve to help the markets the way it did starting in 2009 when it began cutting interest rates dramatically, to where we in essence have a zero interest rate policy. Since rates cannot go much lower than they are, the Fed’s impact on stock prices becomes muted.

 

Whether we go over the cliff and take home pay drops by $500 billion, which is a whopping 7% to 8% of current $6.6 trillion in take home, or whether take home pay drops by $200 billion, both the economy and stocks market will drop.

 

 

Tags:                

3 Responses to Expect Immediate Negative Impact From Higher Taxes

  1. David Engel on December 5, 2012 at 9:47 pm

    Charles: How did you get $200 billion annually? Since it is spread over ten years, that would amount to $2 trillion in tax increases. Also, have you considered what positive impact would be generated by increases in hirig and capex (elimination of uncertainty), as is being touted by business, if a grand bargain were to be reached? Lastly, have you analyzed what additional drag on the markets and economy woul be generated by cuts in government spending?

    Thank you for generating very important issues.

  2. Jeff McClure on December 6, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    Charles would love your insight on the latest Federal tax receipts. Mike Pollaro’s blog over at Forbes shows the deficit dropped to “only” 740B annualized in Q3. http://blogs.forbes.com/michaelpollaro/us-government-finances/

    Any idea why? I understand Q2 being lower since it includes Apr 15, but compared to Q3 2011, 2012 showed higher revenue and (almost unbelievably) lower spending. I say unbelievably because a big portion of Q3 GDP was from gov’t expenditures. Can you explain what happened in a future video?

    Thanks
    Jeff

  3. Dick Green on December 7, 2012 at 9:46 pm

    The “Read More” link for Dec 7 points to the wrong place. It brings up Jul 30 text and video.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Charles BidermanCharles Biderman is the Chairman of TrimTabs Investment Research and Portfolio Manager of the TrimTabs Float Shrink ETF (TTFS)

Biderman’s Practices of Success

I recently launched a new online course, Biderman's Practices of Success, on Curious.com (curious.com/charlesbiderman). The key to the practice of success is to be fully present in the moment and to be totally engaged in the important areas of life, particularly when we do not want to be. Read More.

Mr. Charles Biderman is an associated person of Trim Tabs Asset Management, LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser. All opinions expressed by Mr. Biderman on this website are solely those of Mr. Biderman and do not reflect the opinions of Trim Tabs Asset Management, LLC, Trim Tabs Investment Research, Inc., their affiliates (collectively, “Trim Tabs”), or any other associated persons of Trim Tabs. No part of Mr. Biderman’s compensation from Trim Tabs is related to opinions which he expresses on this website, elsewhere on the internet, or in any other medium.

You should not treat any opinion expressed by Mr. Biderman as a recommendation to make an investment in any company discussed or cited in any of his postings. Mr. Biderman’s opinions are based upon information he considers credible, but which does not constitute research by Trim Tabs. Neither Mr. Biderman nor Trim Tabs warrants the completeness or accuracy of the information upon which Mr. Biderman’s opinions are based.

Archives